Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events
    • Past events
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

Highly sensitive evidence in tribunal might warrant anonymity order

By Emily Shaw
August 17, 2020
  • General
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Anonymity orders can be issued at the discretion of the Employment Tribunal (ET) in order to prevent or restrict the public disclosure of some aspect of the proceedings. Employees may request an anonymity order to protect personal circumstances, safeguard their reputation or make it less likely that they are seen as litigious employees, thereby hampering their future employment prospects. When considering making an order, the tribunal must take into account the right to freedom of expression and the principle of open justice: that justice is being done and is being seen to be done. These factors mean that, in practice, anonymity orders are not frequently made.

In X v. Y UKEAT/0302/18,the claimant sought unpaid wages and holiday pay. The claims were out of time, but the tribunal considered the claimant’s transgender status and mental health issues in deciding whether to extend the time limit and granted an extension. On receiving the judgment, the claimant asked that it be anonymised and all references to X’s transgender status and mental health conditions deleted. The tribunal declined.

On appeal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) overturned the decision of the ET and anonymised the judgment of the ET and its own. The EAT considered the fact that the claimant was unrepresented and therefore would not be aware of the right to apply for an anonymity order, as well as the sensitivities of the claimant’s personal circumstances. The EAT, however, made clear that there is no rule that cases involving transgender individuals or mental health issues must be anonymised. They have to be decided on the facts.

On the issue of deleting sections of the judgment, the EAT held this would rarely be a proportionate measure in order to protect the individual’s privacy. It said deletion would have resulted in a judgment that did not reflect the true reasoning, and the important consideration of open justice outweighed the claimant’s privacy concerns in this case.

This case highlights the balancing act between sensitive personal matters, such as transgender status and mental health issues, and the right to freedom of expression and open justice. The circumstances of this case show which factors may justify an exception to the general rule that justice be seen to be open.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Emily Shaw

About Emily Shaw

Emily Shaw is an associate in Dentons’ Glasgow office. She is a member of the People, Reward and Mobility practice group. Emily focuses on a wide range of UK employment law issues. She has experience in acting for both employers and employees, covering both contentious and non-contentious work. Emily's experience includes: reviewing contracts, company policies and procedures; assisting international businesses; coordinating multijurisdictional projects; and advising clients on exiting strategies.

All posts Full bio

You might also like...

  • General

Changes to criminal record checks regime and the PVG Scheme in Scotland

By Mark Hamilton
  • General

Job Retention Scheme – The government guidance has been published

By Alison Weatherhead
  • Gender pay gap reporting
  • General

Gender pay gap falls to 7.4%

By Tom Fancett

About Dentons

Dentons is the world’s largest law firm, delivering quality and value to clients around the globe. Dentons is a leader on the Acritas Global Elite Brand Index, a BTI Client Service 30 Award winner and recognized by prominent business and legal publications for its innovations in client service, including founding Nextlaw Labs and the Nextlaw Global Referral Network. Dentons’ polycentric approach and world-class talent challenge the status quo to advance client interests in the communities in which we live and work. www.dentons.com.

Dentons Largest Global Elite Law Firm

Twitter

Categories

Dentons logo

© 2021 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site