Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events
    • Past events
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

Discrimination arising from a disability and reasons for dismissal

By Victoria Albon
June 17, 2021
  • Disability
  • Discrimination
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has reaffirmed the importance of properly determining the reason for a dismissal before deciding whether or not, in dismissing an employee, the employer has treated them unfavourably because of something arising in consequence of a disability.

Background

The Claimant, Mr Mohammed, was issued with a final written warning for aggressive behaviour. Shortly afterwards, he was signed off work with anxiety and depression. Whilst on sick leave, and on the advice of his GP, he travelled to Pakistan for a “therapeutic” holiday. The parties disagreed as to whether the Respondent had granted permission for the trip.

The Respondent received Occupational Health advice that the Claimant was fit to return to work. When attempting to contact the Claimant to discuss his return to work, the Respondent was informed that he was in Pakistan. Following a disciplinary process, the Claimant was summarily dismissed for misconduct (a live final written warning being in place for the aggressive behaviour).

The Claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal and discrimination arising from a disability. At first instance, the Tribunal found in the Claimant’s favour. It determined that “but for” his disability he would not have gone to Pakistan, and would not have therefore been dismissed. The Respondent appealed. The grounds for its appeal included that (1) the Tribunal had incorrectly applied the test for discrimination arising from a disability; and (2) the Tribunal had substituted its own decision for that of the employer when determining whether the dismissal was fair.

EAT decision

The EAT upheld the appeal. It found that the Tribunal had incorrectly applied the law. It was not simply a question of whether “but for” the Claimant’s disability he would not have travelled to Pakistan, and so would not have been dismissed. The Tribunal was required to make a finding as to why the Claimant had been dismissed, and then in that context determine whether the Claimant’s dismissal was “something” arising in consequence of his disability. The Tribunal had not sufficiently explored what was in the dismissing officer’s mind at the time he made the decision to dismiss. As a result it had not been able to properly consider whether the dismissal was because of “something” arising in consequence of his disability. The EAT also agreed that, in determining the unfair dismissal claim, the Tribunal had substituted its own decision for that of the Respondent.

The case has been remitted back to a fresh Tribunal for a new hearing.

Implications for employers

The EAT’s decision makes clear the correct application of the law on discrimination arising from a disability. It is important, before dismissing a disabled employee, for an employer to consider carefully its reasons for contemplating dismissal. To identify the risk of proceeding with the dismissal, it should then consider whether or not any of those reasons might be “something” arising in consequence of the employee’s disability.

Whilst the claim may well have still arisen, it probably would not have got to an appeal if the Respondent had been clear about its reasons for dismissing in the disciplinary outcome letter. Employers should usually ensure their reasons are very clear. Failure to do so can leave the door open for ambiguity.

It is important to note that this case has been remitted to a different Tribunal, and so it is possible that the Claimant’s claims will still succeed when the correct tests are applied.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Disability Discrimination, EAT
Victoria Albon

About Victoria Albon

Victoria has experience of advising on a wide range of contentious and non-contentious employment law issues. This includes significant experience of defending a wide range of claims in the employment tribunal, including claims for unfair dismissal and discrimination as well as claims for unlawful deductions of wages, holiday pay and under TUPE. Victoria regularly advises on non-contentious matters including the application of TUPE, handling collective redundancy consultations and changing terms and conditions.

All posts Full bio

You might also like...

  • ACAS
  • Discrimination

Asking and answering questions about workplace discrimination in the UK

By Victoria Albon
  • Disability
  • Discrimination
  • Equal Employment, Diversity and Discrimination
  • Proposed Legislative Changes

The Business Disability Forum weighs in on the government’s consultation on mandatory disability workforce reporting

By Laura Jackson
  • Data protection
  • Discrimination
  • Employment contracts

Philosophical belief case on right to copyright fails

Is an argument about the interpretation of a contract protected as a philosophical belief? No, said the Court of Appeal […]

By Aggie Salt

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site