Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events and training
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

Can re-engagement be ordered if the employer believes that trust and confidence has broken down?

By UK People Reward and Mobility Team
September 2, 2020
  • General
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

This question was considered in the recent case of Kelly v. PGA European Tour.

Mr Kelly, who had begun employment with the PGA in 1989, was dismissed from his role as Group Marketing Director over concerns about his performance and willingness to “buy in” to the newly appointed Chief Executive’s ideas.  Mr Kelly subsequently brought an unfair dismissal claim, but this was not before he had covertly recorded the meetings at which his dismissal had been discussed and effected.

The PGA actually admitted that Mr Kelly’s dismissal was unfair, based on a lack of procedure. In the first instance, the tribunal decided that Mr Kelly should be re-engaged to the role of Commercial Director of the China PGA Tour, for which the ability to speak Mandarin was an essential requirement.

The tribunal considered that any trust and confidence issues arising following Mr Kelly’s covert recording of meetings were not so significant as to make re-engagement impracticable. Further, it considered that Mr Kelly’s willingness to learn Mandarin and his proficiency in languages meant that re-engagement was also practicable from this standpoint. 

The PGA appealed, arguing that the tribunal had erred in considering for itself whether trust and confidence had been damaged instead of asking whether the PGA had a rational basis for believing that it had. The EAT allowed the appeal.

The EAT held that it is the employer’s view of trust and confidence which is key, and this view should only be tested by the tribunal as to its genuineness and rationality. The EAT ruled that the tribunal had overstepped the mark in reaching its own view. With regards to Mr Kelly’s covert recording, which only came to light following his dismissal, the EAT also held that there does not have to be conduct contributing to the dismissal to affect the question of re-engagement, and all of the evidence available at the time of the remedy hearing is to be considered. There was also a finding that the tribunal had overstepped regarding its view on Mr Kelly’s ability to rapidly learn Mandarin, and had failed to give adequate weight to the PGA’s commercial judgment and requirements for the role.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Re-engagement
UK People Reward and Mobility Team

About UK People Reward and Mobility Team

Our People, Reward and Mobility team in the UK advises on all aspects of employment law, both contentious and non-contentious, and covers the full range of pensions and employee benefits issues as well as all areas of immigration law.

All posts

You might also like...

  • General
  • Pensions
  • Pensions Regulator
  • Tribunal procedures

Upper Tribunal upholds the Pensions Regulator’s almost £2 million Contribution Notice

By Eleanor Hart
  • Employee welfare
  • Employment contracts
  • Employment documents
  • Employment policies
  • Family friendly rights
  • General
  • Legislation
  • Legislative changes
  • Proposed legislative changes

Unpacking Labour’s proposed employment law reforms

By Mark Hamilton and Kate Coppack
  • Employment policies
  • General
  • Recruitment

Institute for Public Policy Research publishes report on possible impacts of generative AI

By Christopher Seymour

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site