Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events and training
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

All work and no play – new working time statistics

By Emma Carter
August 6, 2020
  • Working Time
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

It turns out that most people in the UK are now working fewer hours, but are also spending less time on leisure compared to the 1970s.

The Resolution Foundation, an independent UK think tank focused on improving the standard of living of low and middle income families, has studied changes in working time in the period since 1974. Last month, it published the results. The key statistics show differences between working time in 1974 and working time in 2014-2015.

In comparison to 1974:

  • men and women are taking on a more equal share of paid and unpaid work;
  • in households in the top income quartile, men’s paid working time has changed very little whereas paid working time for women in this quartile has significantly increased;
  • in households in the lowest income quartile, women’s paid working time has decreased and men are also working three hours fewer a day; and
  • the only demographic group with more leisure time is low income men.

What do these statistics mean in terms of the bigger picture? On the one hand, they show some progress on gender equality since 1974 as men and women are taking on a more equal share of paid work. However, this study only shows progress in terms of working time, and not on working pay. The gender pay gap persists, while the working time gap closes.

Working time has levelled out more for households in the top income quartile, whereas households in the lower income quartile are working less. Several policymakers have called for a four-day working week, which would result in a reduction of working time hours. It is evident that such a proposal may not support lower income households which may actually wish to increase their working hours or, at least, prevent a further reduction.

In addition, leisure time has actually decreased for all demographic groups except low income men. Both men and women spend more time on unpaid work, such as childcare. However, women still do more unpaid work than men.

The Foundation’s report suggests that two-thirds of working people would like more leisure time. This may seem like support for a four-day working week but the statistics clearly demonstrate that less working time does not necessarily mean more leisure time.

The Foundation’s survey also found that respondents valued control over the timing of their work, rather than a reduction in work. Employees would much rather have greater flexibility than fewer working hours. This is good news for employers – employees do want to work, just a little more flexibly. Common employee complaints around, for example, short-notice changes to shifts, a lack of flexibility around time off and large workload deadlines should still be taken seriously to boost retention and increase morale.

This, of course, ties in with the fact that employers are already seeing more flexible working requests, given the home working which was enforced for many employees as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The full report can be found here.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
The Resolution Foundation, Working time
Emma Carter

About Emma Carter

Emma has broad experience in employment law dealing with contentious and non-contentious matters and acting for both employers and employees. She mainly provides strategic, commercial advice to both domestic and global corporate clients in both the public and private sectors, and, in particular, the financial services, retail, recruitment, education, hospitality and leisure and charity industries.

All posts Full bio

You might also like...

  • GDPR
  • National Minimum Wage
  • Working Time

No pay for the commute: the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s latest take on travel time and wages

By Laura Jackson
  • Discrimination
  • Dispute resolution
  • Termination
  • Tribunal procedures
  • Unfair dismissal
  • Working Time

Supreme Court rules that embassy staff are not excluded by state immunity

In the recent case of Benkharbouche v. Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs & Anor the Supreme Court agreed with the EAT and the Court of Appeal and unanimously held that sections 4(2)(b) and 16(1)(a) of the State Immunity Act 1978 (SIA) cannot protect embassies from Employment Tribunal claims brought by domestic staff in the UK.

By Helena Rozman
  • COVID-19
  • Employee welfare
  • Employment policies
  • Flexible working
  • Overtime
  • Wellbeing
  • Working Time

European Commission launches consultation on possible right to disconnect

By Victoria Albon

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site