Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events and training
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

Requirement for an actor to not be visibly pregnant not a genuine occupational requirement

By Victoria Albon
September 8, 2021
  • Discrimination
  • Equality Act
  • Sex discrimination
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

We look at how genuine occupational requirement exceptions are applied (where discrimination is permitted under the Equality Act) on our website.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Discrimination, Equality bill, sex discrimination
Victoria Albon

About Victoria Albon

Victoria has experience of advising on a wide range of contentious and non-contentious employment law issues. This includes significant experience of defending a wide range of claims in the employment tribunal, including claims for unfair dismissal and discrimination as well as claims for unlawful deductions of wages, holiday pay and under TUPE. Victoria regularly advises on non-contentious matters including the application of TUPE, handling collective redundancy consultations and changing terms and conditions.

All posts Full bio

You might also like...

  • Discrimination
  • Employee welfare
  • Employment policies

New religion at work research shows discrimination is still commonplace

By Emma Carter
  • Discrimination
  • Dispute resolution
  • Termination
  • Tribunal procedures
  • Unfair dismissal
  • Working Time

Supreme Court rules that embassy staff are not excluded by state immunity

In the recent case of Benkharbouche v. Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs & Anor the Supreme Court agreed with the EAT and the Court of Appeal and unanimously held that sections 4(2)(b) and 16(1)(a) of the State Immunity Act 1978 (SIA) cannot protect embassies from Employment Tribunal claims brought by domestic staff in the UK.

By Helena Rozman
  • Discrimination
  • Employment status
  • Grievance and disciplinary
  • Legislation
  • Tribunal claims
  • Whistleblowing

Court of Appeal rules that external job applicants cannot claim whistleblowing detriment

We look at the Court of Appeal’s decision that external job applicants do not benefit from whistleblowing protection, and the […]

By Emily Russell and Alison Weatherhead

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site