Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events
    • Past events
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

EAT considers reasonableness of final written warning on fairness of dismissal

By Victoria Middleditch
August 27, 2021
  • Employment Documents
  • Employment policies
  • Termination
  • Tribunal claims
  • Unfair dismissal
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In the recent case of Fallahi v.TWI Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (the EAT), considered whether a tribunal is required to look behind an employer’s final written warning when determining whether a dismissal was fair.

Facts

In this case, the employer had concerns about the claimant’s performance as Senior Project Manager. After consistently failing to meet targets, the claimant was put on a performance management plan, with his targets to be reviewed on three different dates.

However, prior to his review meetings, the employer concluded that the claimant had made insufficient improvement, held a capability hearing, at which the claimant was given objectives, a review period and a final written warning.

A number of review meetings took place. Before the end of the review period, the employer concluded that the employee was nowhere near meeting the objectives. The employer gave the claimant the option of continuing with the review period or leaving the company with a month’s compensation. This offer was rejected by the claimant and, although there were settlement discussions, it became apparent that no agreement was going to be reached.  

The claimant failed to attend a number of performance and capability hearings, on the grounds of sickness, although an occupational health adviser considered he was well enough to attend. The employer, therefore, made the decision to dismiss the claimant on the ground of capability.  

The claimant made an unfair dismissal claim, alleging that there were a number of procedural shortfalls that rendered his dismissal unfair. In particular, the claimant relied on the fact that he was not provided with a copy of the employer’s capability procedure and was also given his final warning before any of the dates for performance review had arrived.

The Employment Tribunal (the ET) decision

The ET dismissed the claim, stating that the reason to dismiss the employee fell within the band of reasonable responses. In reaching this decision, the ET applied the “manifestly inappropriate” test, which established that it is not for a tribunal to look behind a final written warning if it is concluded that the written warning was issued in good faith and was not “manifestly inappropriate”. The claimant appealed against this decision.

The EAT decision

The EAT dismissed the appeal, finding that the use of a final warning was appropriate, both procedurally and substantively and that the dismissal was fair. In reaching this decision, the EAT made specific reference to the fact that, in this case, the ET was required to judge the reasonableness of the dismissal, and not the reasonableness or appropriateness of the final warning.

In this case, when assessing the reasonableness of the decision to dismiss, the EAT emphasised that the issuing of the final written warning was only one of the factors to be taken into account. The EAT  also took into account that the claimant had a prolonged period of poor performance and that, despite the claimant’s engagement with the performance management plan, continually failed to meet targets. The EAT, therefore, upheld the ET’s findings that: (1) the dismissal was fair and fell within the band of reasonable responses; and (2) that the ET was not required to go behind the written warning in reaching this conclusion.

What does this mean for employers?

This decision will be welcomed by many employers. If an employer is faced with dismissing an employee on capability grounds, they can take comfort in knowing that that the reasons for issuing any prior written warnings will not be considered by the tribunal, as long as they can show that the warnings were made in good faith and were not manifestly inappropriate. Instead, the tribunal will look at the circumstances of the dismissal as a whole and consider whether the reasons to dismiss the employee were reasonable.

If employers are faced with underperforming employees, it is beneficial to engage with the employee at an early stage and to exhaust an informal performance improvement plan first, if appropriate. If poor performance persists, the employer should then make the formal capability procedure available to the employee and explain the potential outcomes should performance not improve. This is also a timely reminder to employers to make it clear to employees the precise reasons for their dismissal.  The employer should ensure that it has a paper trail of all capability meeting minutes and outcome letters, so that if the employee later decides to challenge the employer’s decision, it is able to defend it.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Employment Appeal Tribunal
Victoria Middleditch

About Victoria Middleditch

Victoria is an employment lawyer in Dentons' London office. She provides support to businesses on the full range of employment law and human resources issues. Her experience includes advising on commercial transactions and re-organizations (including complex TUPE matters), employment disputes (both tribunal and civil court litigation), team moves, employment contracts and policies, bonus and commission schemes, and general day-to-day human resources issues.

All posts Full bio

You might also like...

  • Atypical workers
  • Brexit
  • COVID-19
  • Employment policies
  • Legislation

The future of work – UK government announces a review

By Lorelle Doyle
  • Employment Status
  • Pay, benefits and bonuses
  • Termination

Autumn Budget – employment provisions

The Chancellor has spoken and presented his first Autumn Budget.

By Verity Buckingham
  • COVID-19
  • Tribunal claims

Employment Tribunal can serve ET1 claim forms by email during the COVID-19 pandemic

By Helena Rozman

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

Dentons logo

© 2022 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site