Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events and training
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

Heard it on the radio: discriminatory statements fall within EU’s Equal Treatment Directive

By Kate Coppack
May 5, 2020
  • Discrimination
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In the European Court of Justice (CJEU) case of NH v. Associazione Avvocatura per i diritti LGBTI (Case C-507/18), a senior lawyer said he would not recruit or work with homosexual people at his firm during an Italian radio interview. His firm was not recruiting at the time and they did not receive complaints from any individuals. However, an association defending the rights of LGBT people in court brought an action against him for damages. This made its way to the Italian Supreme Court who, in turn, made a reference to the CJEU.

The CJEU held that discriminatory statements like this can fall within the material scope of the EU Equal Treatment Directive, thus founding a discrimination claim. For this to happen, there must be a link between statements made and the employer’s recruitment policy. This involves looking at whether the person making the statement is capable, or can be perceived as being capable, of influencing recruitment policy or decisions, assessing whether the remarks are discriminatory in how they relate to accessing employment and examining the context in which the statements were made i.e. whether they were private, public or broadcast. This will be a matter for national courts to establish but, if these limbs can be satisfied, there will be a “non-hypothetical” link between the statement and access to employment, and the remark could lead to a valid discrimination claim.

The CJEU considered that its interpretation of the Directive did result in possible limitations on the freedom of expression, but that right is not absolute right. That right is subject both to the limitations provided by law and the principle of proportionality.

This is an interesting case that may serve as a reminder to employers regarding the importance of regularly reviewing their recruitment policies and practices. Employers also need to ensure that all employees involved in (or perceived to be involved in) recruitment processes are aware of their obligations in this respect.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Kate Coppack

About Kate Coppack

Kate is an associate in the People, Reward and Mobility practice in Dentons' Milton Keynes office, with a focus on employment law. Kate advises on both contentious and non-contentious areas of employment law.

All posts

You might also like...

  • COVID-19
  • Disability
  • Discrimination
  • Flexible working
  • Mental health
  • Wellbeing

Supporting disabled workers in a hybrid working world

By Amy Gordon and Alison Weatherhead
  • Discrimination
  • Family friendly rights

No requirement to enhance pay for shared parental leave

We blogged in June last year about the employment tribunal claim of Ali -v- Capita Customer Management Ltd where Mr Ali was successful in his claim for direct sex discrimination. Female employees at Capita were entitled to 14 weeks’ full pay on maternity leave whereas fathers were only entitled to two weeks’ full pay on paternity and shared parental leave. Mr Ali's wife was advised to return to work early from maternity leave after being diagnosed with post natal depression. Mr Ali asked Capita whether he could take leave instead and was told he could take shared parental leave on statutory pay. The Tribunal found that this was direct sex discrimination.

By Claire Maclean
  • Discrimination
  • Tribunal claims
  • Unfair dismissal
  • Vicarious liability
  • Whistleblowing

Employer liability for whistleblowing detriments: First Greater Western Ltd v. Moussa

By Emma Carter

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site