Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events and training
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

Non-compete clause in the spotlight

By Claire Maclean
May 29, 2020
  • Employment contracts
  • Interim Relief
  • Restrictive Covenants
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Post-termination restrictions, including non-compete clauses, are an important tool in protecting key client information, know-how and relationships which can often be an employer’s most valuable assets.

In Square Global Limited v. Leonard,Mr Leonard was a broker and his contract of employment included a six-month notice period and a restriction that prevented him from working for a competitor for six months after his employment terminated.  He resigned from his employment without notice to go and work for a competitor.  He claimed he had been constructively dismissed and was therefore released from his obligation to give notice and from the non-compete clause.

The High Court rejected his argument, holding there was no constructive dismissal and that he had breached his employment contract.  It accepted his employer’s argument that Mr Leonard should remain employed by them for his full six-month notice period.

The High Court went on to find that the six-month non-compete clause was reasonable and went no further than necessary to protect his employer’s legitimate business interests.  Importantly it also decided that the absence of a “set-off” clause which would have reduced the restricted period by any time spent on garden leave was not fatal to the restriction. Accordingly it decided that not only was Mr Leonard required to serve out his notice but wuld also b subject to the six month restriction.  He would therefore be kept out of the market for a total period of 12 months before he could go and work for a competitor.

This case is a useful reminder that:

  • non-compete clauses can, and will, be enforced by the courts;
  • such restrictions still need to be carefully drafted so that they go no further than reasonably necessary to protect the employer’s legitimate business interests; and
  • an offset provision in respect of garden leave is not an absolute requirement though the longer the covenanted period the more likely this is to be necessary to meet the reasonableness test.
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Claire Maclean

About Claire Maclean

Claire is experienced in advising employer clients in the public and private sectors on a wide range of contentious and non-contentious matters. Her expertise ranges from providing practical and commercial advice on all day-to-day HR queries to providing strategic advice on complex business reorganizations, redundancies and TUPE transfers. Claire has considerable experience in advising clients on all aspects of TUPE transfers, whether business transfers or changes in service provider.

All posts Full bio

You might also like...

  • ACAS
  • Employment contracts
  • Termination

Dismissal and re-engagement under fire

By Sarah Lovell
  • Restrictive Covenants

Defending the field: restrictive covenants revisited for the Euros

By Laura Jackson
  • Employment contracts
  • Trade Unions

The end of a three-year “fire and rehire” battle over “permanent” rights

By Sarah Lovell

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site