Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events
    • Past events
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

Whistleblowing – a reminder for employers

By Amy Gordon
November 3, 2021
  • Whistleblowing
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Two recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decisions highlight the importance of recognising when workers or employees have made a protected disclosure, and the risk of claims being brought against employers who fail to respond appropriately.

Claims

Workers and employees are protected from detrimental treatment or dismissal for having made protected disclosures (whistleblowing). In order to benefit from that protection, a number of conditions must be satisfied:

  • The individual must disclose information.
  • The individual must reasonably believe the disclosure is in the public interest.
  • The subject matter of the disclosure must relate to a “relevant failure” such as a criminal offence or breach of an obligation.
  • The individual must reasonably believe that there has been or will be such a relevant failure.

The disclosure must be made to a particular category of person such as the employer or a regulator. It used to be a requirement that the disclosure was made in “good faith” but this is no longer part of the legal test.

Where whistleblowing is the sole or principal reason for a dismissal, it will automatically be an unfair dismissal and the amount of compensation a tribunal can award is uncapped.

Recent cases

Martin v. London Borough of Southwark

A teacher brought a claim that he was subjected to a detriment because he had shared concerns that he and his colleagues were working hours that exceeded the statutory directed time. The teacher raised his concerns in emails sent to the head teacher of his school and the school governors. The Employment Tribunal (ET) held that none of the disclosures he relied upon were protected disclosures as they were not in the public interest and dismissed the claim.

On appeal, the EAT rejected the reasoning of the ET because it had focused on the claimant’s motive for making the disclosure, rather than considering whether the claimant reasonably believed both that the disclosure was in the public interest and that there was a breach of a legal obligation. A disclosure could reasonably be believed to be in the public interest even if the claimant’s motive was predominantly to advance their own interest. The EAT found that ET had not applied the correct test and directed that the case be reheard by a fresh tribunal.

Secure Care UK Limited v. Mr R Mott

The claimant was employed as a logistics manager for three months until he was made redundant along with two other employees. The claimant had made nine protected disclosures to Secure Care UK Limited in relation to its breach of a statutory obligation and endangering the health and safety of workers. Mr Mott claimed that he was made redundant due to the protected disclosures he had made. The ET upheld his claim in relation to three of the protected disclosures as it considered they had a “material influence” upon his selection for redundancy and dismissal. Secure Care UK Limited appealed the decision.

The EAT allowed the appeal in favour of Secure Care UK Limited as the ET had applied the wrong test when looking at whether the reason for dismissal was whistleblowing. The ET incorrectly asked itself whether the protected disclosure “materially influenced” the decision to dismiss. It should have asked whether the disclosures (or any of them) were the sole or principal reason for dismissal.

Comment

In both of the above cases, a new ET will have to consider the facts and reach a new decision, so the detriment and dismissal claims may or may not yet succeed. These cases highlight the complexity of the legal test that applies to protected disclosures and that care must be taken to identify when employees benefit from enhanced protection against detriment and dismissal. Failure to consider this properly may result in expensive claims against employers.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Whistleblowing;
Amy Gordon

About Amy Gordon

All posts

You might also like...

  • Confidential Information
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Employment Documents
  • Legislative Changes
  • Trade Unions
  • Whistleblowing

Insight: UK Employment Law Round-up – May 2016

During our Annual Update seminar on 27 April 2016, we discussed some of the legislative changes that employers should look […]

By Sarah Beeby
  • Termination
  • Unfair dismissal
  • Whistleblowing

Kilraine v London Borough of Wandsworth [2018]

A recent case has considered the issue of what amounts to a protected disclosure. In Kilraine v. London Borough of Wandsworth [2018], the Court of Appeal guided Employment Tribunals in such cases to focus on determining whether there was a "protected disclosure" and whether the disclosed information, showed or tended to show that one or more of the six specified types of malpractice had taken place or was likely to take place – for example a breach of a legal obligation.

By Verity Buckingham
  • Whistleblowing

Whistleblowing: Is a detriment suffered outside work as a result of a disclosure protected by the Employment Rights Act?

In the recent case of Tiplady v City of Bradford Metropolitan Council the Court of Appeal considered whether a detriment suffered by […]

By Aggie Salt

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site