Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events and training
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

Can unguaranteed work constitute alternative employment in redundancy situations?

By Helena Rozman
September 10, 2020
  • General
  • Redundancy and business reorganisation
  • Unfair dismissal
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Before employers dismiss an employee by reason of redundancy, they have a responsibility to take reasonable steps to look for an alternative to redundancy and to consult employees about those alternatives.

In Aramark (UK) Ltd v. Fernandes, Mr Fernandes argued that, before being made redundant, he should have been added to Aramark’s list of additional workers. This pool of workers were supplementary to Aramark’s usual workforce and could be called upon as and when required in times of reduced capacity. The workers on this list were (by their nature) not employed by Aramark, nor were they guaranteed work. However, they had the prospect of ad hoc future paid work.

The tribunal agreed with Mr Fernandes and held that, by not consulting him about the pool of additional resource, Aramark’s dismissal of Mr Fernandes was unfair. However, on appeal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) confirmed that the relevant question was whether Aramark had behaved reasonably in treating redundancy as a sufficient ground for dismissing Mr Fernandes. The EAT decision turned on the fact that if Mr Fernandes had been added to the list of additional resource, it would not have avoided his dismissal by reason of redundancy. He would not have been provided with a guarantee of alternative employment. It found, therefore, that Aramark’s failure to add Mr Fernandes to the pool of workers was not relevant for the purposes of determining fairness under Section 98(4) Employment Rights Act.

Employers are reminded that it is well established by case law that the dismissal of an employee for redundancy may be unfair if the employer fails to make a reasonable search for suitable alternative employment. However, employers can be reassured by further case law which confirms that this duty is not to make every possible effort to look for alternative employment, but simply to make reasonable efforts.

If you have any questions on any of the issues arising from this post, please do get in touch with the People, Reward and Mobility team at Dentons for assistance.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Alternatives to redundancy, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal
Helena Rozman

About Helena Rozman

Helena has experience in acting for both employees and employers covering both contentious and non-contentious work. Helena's experience includes defending Employment Tribunal claims and engaging in settlement negotiations; advising clients on complex disciplinary matters, exit strategies and large restructuring exercises, including TUPE and redundancy; co-ordinating and responding to data subject access requests; advising on the employment implications on business and asset purchases and outsourcing arrangements; project managing and advising clients on multi-jurisdictional projects with our international offices; drafting settlement agreements for exiting employees; advising on the employment aspects of corporate transactions and undertaking due diligence; and reviewing contracts, company handbooks and policies.

All posts Full bio

You might also like...

  • Disability
  • Discrimination
  • Dispute resolution
  • Employment status
  • Unfair dismissal

Reasonable adjustments for disabled employees: a case for trial periods

By Karen Farrell and Elouisa Crichton
  • COVID-19
  • Unfair dismissal

Dismissal for refusing to wear face mask can be fair

Over the past year, face masks have become an ordinary part of life and it was only a matter of time before they became the focus of a workplace dispute. In the first such dispute to reach a tribunal, Kubilius v Kent Foods Ltd (ET/3201960/2020), an employment tribunal found that a lorry driver was dismissed fairly for his refusal to wear a face mask on a client's premises.

By Kate Coppack
  • Disability
  • Discrimination
  • Mental health
  • Unfair dismissal
  • Wellbeing

World Cancer Day 2022: Supporting employees with cancer

By Sarah Jackman

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site