Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events and training
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

Legal advice privilege and amended investigation reports: a closer look at the University of Dundee v. Chakraborty [2023] Scot CS CSIH 22

By Leslie Martin
June 19, 2023
  • Confidential Information
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Legal Privilege
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

The case of University of Dundee v. Chakraborty [2023] considered whether the release of the final version of an investigation report, which contained a footnote acknowledging amendments made following “independent legal advice”, meant that privilege was waived so rendering the original version disclosable.

Facts

Mr Chakraborty, a research assistant at the University of Dundee (the University) raised a grievance. The University appointed a member of staff to investigate and prepare an investigation report. The University sought external legal advice on the investigation report, resulting in amendments being made. Mr Chakraborty subsequently initiated tribunal proceedings. Only the final version of the investigation report was included in the tribunal bundle. This contained a footnote indicating that it had been revised following independent legal advice. Mr Chakraborty requested sight of the original report which the University refused, arguing that it was now privileged due to the amendments made. Mr Chakraborty applied for disclosure of the original investigation report. The case went all the way to the Scottish Court of Session (CoS).

The University had conceded that the original version of the investigation report was not privileged (any advice obtained could not have influenced the original version because that advice was sought after it had been drafted). The question was therefore whether the original version became confidential when the final version was issued because a comparison of the documents would allow Mr Chakraborty to work out what the legal advice had been. The CoS agreed that, generally, privilege will extend to material which would allow the reader to work out what legal advice had been given. However, in this case, the original report did not do that. Mr Chakraborty may only have been able to deduce what legal advice had been given as a result of the University’s footnote alerting him to the fact that changes had been made to the investigation report following legal advice. The CoS held that any privilege there had been was “abandoned” when the University shared the legal advice with its investigator and, in any event, it was “certainly lost” when the University revealed in its footnote that the original report had been altered following advice.

Key takeaways

This case highlights that engaging external legal advisers to review and amend investigation reports will not automatically grant privilege to the resulting report and, perhaps more importantly, to earlier drafts of the report. Employers should also be careful not to inadvertently waive privilege which may exist by alerting their employees that an investigation report has been amended following legal advice.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Confidential Information, Dispute Resolution, legal privilege
Leslie Martin

About Leslie Martin

Leslie has a wealth of experience acting for employers and employees on contentious and non-contentious matters, including: advising on employment documentation (including employment contracts, service agreements, consultancy agreements, handbooks etc.); conducting complex settlement negotiations; negotiating exits; advising on settlement agreements; advising on restrictive covenants; advising on day-to-day HR and disciplinary issues; and advising on a number of unfair dismissal and discrimination claims.

All posts Full bio

You might also like...

  • Confidential Information
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Employment Documents
  • Legislative Changes
  • Trade Unions
  • Whistleblowing

Insight: UK Employment Law Round-up – May 2016

During our Annual Update seminar on 27 April 2016, we discussed some of the legislative changes that employers should look […]

By Sarah Beeby
  • Confidential Information
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Tribunal procedures
  • Uncategorized

When can off the record discussions be used in evidence?

Section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 enables “pre-termination negotiations” to take place between an employer and employee to […]

By Lisa Watson
  • Confidential Information
  • Employee benefits
  • Employee welfare
  • Employment policies
  • Recruitment
  • Restrictive Covenants

Protecting your business from the “great resignation”

By Elouisa Crichton

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site