Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events
    • Past events
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

The last straw: what does it take to break the camel’s back?

By Sarah Lovell
May 15, 2020
  • Constructive dismissal
  • Disciplinary procedures
  • Termination
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In Williams v. Governing Body of Alderman Davies Church in Wales Primary School, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered the “last straw” doctrine and whether a truly trivial act which causes an employee to resign can then be relied upon in a claim of constructive unfair dismissal.

In order to succeed in a claim of constructive unfair dismissal, an employee has to show that the employer has fundamentally breached a term of their contract of employment.  This is often the implied duty of trust and confidence.  The “last straw” doctrine allows an employee to rely on a series of breaches over a period of time which together amount to a breach of trust and confidence.  In previous case law, it has been decided that the last straw must not be something totally innocuous and that it must contribute something to the breach, although this may be insignificant.

Mr Williams was a teacher in the school.  Allegations were made against him relating to a child protection matter.  He was suspended but not given any details of the allegations against him.  A Social Services investigation decided that no further action should be taken and Mr Williams was allowed to return to school, but not to teaching duties while the school carried out its own investigation. He was still not given full details of the allegation he was facing.  Mr Williams then went off sick with stress.   

Mr Williams had downloaded certain documents that he believed would assist him in defending any allegations and shared these with a fellow teacher, Mrs Sydenham, who was also his union representative.  The school commenced disciplinary proceedings against both Mr Williams and Mrs Sydenham.  When he wished to speak to Mrs Sydenham, the school told him that he could not contact her.  He then resigned, citing the reason as the refusal to allow him to contact Mrs Sydenham.

The Employment Tribunal was highly critical of the school but decided that Mr Williams’ claim for constructive unfair dismissal must fail because the “last straw” (refusal to allow him to contact Mrs Sydenham) was not unreasonable given the ongoing disciplinary investigation and, therefore, was innocuous.  Mr Williams appealed.

The EAT allowed the appeal.  It decided that, as long as there has been a breach of contract by the employer and the employee has resigned in response, at least in part, to that breach, a constructive unfair dismissal claim will succeed.  In this case, Mr Williams had not affirmed the previous breaches of contract and so could still rely on them.

This case is a useful reminder that even seemingly trivial acts can still tip an employee into resigning.  In cases where there has been a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence which has not been affirmed by the employee, they may still succeed with a constructive unfair dismissal claim.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Breach of Employment Contract, Employment Appeal Tribunal, Resignation, Trust and Confidence
Sarah Lovell

About Sarah Lovell

Sarah is a senior associate in the Milton Keynes office specializing in employment law. She joined the team in February 2020, having spent nearly two years working in-house for a large recruitment business.

All posts Full bio

You might also like...

  • Restrictive Covenants
  • Termination

Non-compete clauses: Government to investigate the impact

The Government’s view is that the UK thrives on innovation. It recognises that innovation enables businesses to develop new ideas, […]

By Verity Buckingham
  • Disability
  • Discrimination
  • Mental health
  • Termination

Paranoid delusions may not amount to disability

By Aggie Salt
  • Termination
  • Uncategorized

References – to give or not to give?

There is generally no obligation on an employer to give a reference at all.  There are, of course, exceptions – […]

By Claire McKee

About Dentons

Dentons is the world’s largest law firm, delivering quality and value to clients around the globe. Dentons is a leader on the Acritas Global Elite Brand Index, a BTI Client Service 30 Award winner and recognized by prominent business and legal publications for its innovations in client service, including founding Nextlaw Labs and the Nextlaw Global Referral Network. Dentons’ polycentric approach and world-class talent challenge the status quo to advance client interests in the communities in which we live and work. www.dentons.com.

Dentons Largest Global Elite Law Firm

Twitter

Categories

Dentons logo

© 2021 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site