Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events
    • Past events
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

ACAS Code applied to sham redundancy procedures

By Verity Buckingham
June 20, 2022
  • ACAS
  • Compensation
  • Disciplinary procedures
  • Discrimination
  • Grievance and Disciplinary
  • Redundancy and business reorganisation
  • Sex Discrimination
  • Tribunal claims
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In handling certain workplace issues, best practice and tribunals dictate that employers should be mindful of the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures (the Code) to ensure that they are acting fairly and reasonably. The Code sets out the minimum steps that an employer should follow when handling a grievance or disciplinary matter for poor performance or misconduct. Failure to comply with the Code may result in compensatory awards being uplifted by as much as 25% by the tribunal. However, the Code explicitly states that it does not apply to redundancy situations.

In the recent case of Rentplus UK Ltd v. Coulson [2022] EAT 81, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether an uplift in compensation had been properly applied, where the dismissal was purportedly due to redundancy.

Case facts

Ms Coulson was a member of the Rentplus UK Ltd (Rentplus) leadership team and was Director of Partnerships. She was made redundant by Rentplus following a reorganisation process in August 2018. Prior to being dismissed, she raised a grievance that the impact of the proposed reorganisation did not trigger a redundancy of her role, and that she had been marginalised by the new CEO. Her grievance and appeal were not upheld. She brought claims of unfair dismissal and direct sex discrimination before the Employment Tribunal (ET).

The ET found that the redundancy consultation meetings that had taken place were a sham, and that the decision to dismiss Ms Coulson had been taken at least a year before the consultation meetings started. It found that the real reason for her dismissal was a desire to remove her from her role, and that her role was not redundant. Ms Coulson succeeded in both her claims and the ET awarded a 25% uplift on her compensatory award for Rentplus’s failure to follow the Code. Rentplus appealed to the EAT on the basis that the ET had failed to identify the relevant parts of the Code which had not been followed and that, in any event, no uplift should have been made where Rentplus’s reason for dismissal was redundancy and the ET had concluded there was sex discrimination.

The EAT upheld the ET’s decision and dismissed the appeal. The EAT held that, in disciplinary situations, an employer cannot avoid complying with the Code by presenting their reasons as something other than a performance or misconduct issue, such as a redundancy. In addition, a finding of unlawful discrimination does not preclude the application of the Code. A finding of discrimination does not require that the principal reason for the treatment was a protected characteristic (e.g. sex). Issues with an employee’s conduct or capability, even if they are a result of discriminatory assumptions, will still be deemed a disciplinary situation to which the Code applies, and thus a fair capability or disciplinary procedure should have been followed.

The EAT decision is a reminder to employers that the Code can apply in instances that are not being addressed as disciplinaries or grievances. If an employer’s alternative reason for dismissal is not upheld and an ET finds the principal reason was really performance or misconduct, the Code may apply. Prudent employers should therefore bear the Code in mind when undertaking any dismissal process (or grievance process) to ascertain its applicability and to limit exposure to a finding by an ET that compensation be uplifted by up to 25%.  

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
ACAS, Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures, Discrimination, grievance and disciplinary, redundancy and business reorganisation, sex discrimination, Tribunal claims
Verity Buckingham

About Verity Buckingham

Verity is experienced in all aspects of employment law and corporate immigration matters. She deals mostly with corporate clients advising on contentious and non-contentious employment matters. Verity's contentious practice includes defending claims in the Employment Tribunal and experience of Employment Appeal Tribunal litigation in relation to claims of unfair dismissal, discrimination, equal pay and whistleblowing.

All posts Full bio

You might also like...

  • Discrimination

Has the Court of Justice of the European Union opened the door for employers to discriminate against employees who wear religious dress?

Have the recent Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) cases of C-157/15 Achbita, Centrum voor Gelijkheid van kansen […]

By Michelle Lamb
  • Discrimination
  • Recruitment

Greek government's imposition of height restrictions on its police force falls short of equal treatment

In the recent case of Ypourgos Ethnikis Pedias kai Thriskevmaton v. Kalliri, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held that the requirement for candidates for the Greek police academy to be at least 170cm tall amounted to indirect sex discrimination which could not be objectively justified.

By Helena Rozman
  • Discrimination
  • Equal Pay
  • Ethnic pay gap reporting

Ethnic inequalities in the UK labour market and what employers can do to embrace diversity and inclusion

By Harriet Gray

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site