Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events
    • Past events
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

For better or for worse – marriage and civil partnership discrimination

By Helena Rozman
June 18, 2020
  • Discrimination
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In the recent case of Gould v. St John’s Downshire Hill UKEAT/0002/20/BA, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that dismissing a minister because his marriage had broken down could amount to marriage discrimination.

In 2016, Mr Gould was dismissed from his role as a vicar at St John’s Downshire Hill church on the grounds that his employer had lost trust and confidence in him. However, he alleged that the real reason was because of the breakdown of his marriage and he brought a claim for unfair dismissal and direct marriage discrimination.

The EAT held that it would have been possible for this claim to succeed if the claimant’s behaviour was not the substantial reason for his dismissal, or if the Trustees thought a vicar’s marital breakdown meant he could be sacked. However, on the facts of the case, neither of the above scenarios applied and the appeal was dismissed.

Whilst this case is fairly fact-specific, it serves as a useful reminder that marriage and civil partnership discrimination should not be overlooked by employers. This protected characteristic will apply to individuals who are married or in a civil partnership. It covers any formal union which is legally recognised in the UK as a marriage, as well as civil partnerships between same sex partners and, since 2 December 2019, opposite sex partners in England and Wales.

The protected characteristic of marriage and civil partnership can also overlap with other protected characteristics, such as sexual orientation, gender reassignment, sex, religion or belief, and race. Therefore, employers should always consider that, whilst discrimination may be linked to a marriage or civil partnership, the circumstances may have an equal or greater link with another protected characteristic. Having an effective equality and diversity policy in place alongside well-trained staff will help avoid potential discrimination claims, while creating an inclusive workplace for all staff.

However, as with all potential discrimination claims, there can be a fine line between a person’s protected characteristic and their behaviour. In this case, the EAT held that the reason for the claimant’s dismissal was a loss of trust and confidence in him as a result of his general behaviour. Whilst his marital difficulties were part of the background of the case, this was not a case of marriage discrimination. Therefore, employers should remain alive to this distinction when dealing with potential issues, and be ready to evidence their reason for dismissal (or otherwise) thoroughly.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Helena Rozman

About Helena Rozman

Helena has experience in acting for both employees and employers covering both contentious and non-contentious work. Helena's experience includes defending Employment Tribunal claims and engaging in settlement negotiations; advising clients on complex disciplinary matters, exit strategies and large restructuring exercises, including TUPE and redundancy; co-ordinating and responding to data subject access requests; advising on the employment implications on business and asset purchases and outsourcing arrangements; project managing and advising clients on multi-jurisdictional projects with our international offices; drafting settlement agreements for exiting employees; advising on the employment aspects of corporate transactions and undertaking due diligence; and reviewing contracts, company handbooks and policies.

All posts Full bio

You might also like...

  • Disability
  • Discrimination
  • Equal Employment, Diversity and Discrimination
  • Proposed Legislative Changes

The Business Disability Forum weighs in on the government’s consultation on mandatory disability workforce reporting

By Laura Jackson
  • Discrimination
  • Recruitment

Social media algorithms and discriminatory job advertisements – are employers liable?

By Victoria Middleditch
  • Discrimination
  • Government Proposals

Government proposes major overhaul of Gender Recognition Act

The Government Equality Office (GEO) is proposing reform of the Gender Recognition Act 2004. This Act enables transgender people to obtain legal recognition of their acquired gender by the issuing of a Gender Recognition Certificate and changing the sex on their birth certificate.

By Claire McKee

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

Dentons logo

© 2022 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site