Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events
    • Past events
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

Has your diversity training gone “stale”?

By UK People Reward and Mobility Team
February 11, 2021
  • Discrimination
  • Employment policies
  • General
  • Harassment
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Training which has become “stale” and out of date will not be sufficient to establish the “reasonable steps” defence to harassment, so held the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in the recent case of Allay v. Gehlen.

The Claimant, who described himself as being “of Indian origin”, was subject to racist comments at work on a regular basis. He subsequently raised a claim for harassment related to race, in which the employer sought to rely on the “reasonable steps” defence – i.e. that it had taken all reasonable steps to prevent the discriminatory act. In support of this defence, the employer argued that it had provided equality and diversity training to its employees.  

When looking at whether an employer has established this defence, a tribunal is entitled to consider how effective the steps taken were, or were likely to be.

Although the EAT accepted that the training had taken place, it upheld the tribunal’s decision to reject this defence given that the training was delivered more than a year prior to the acts, and had clearly become “stale”.

This was evidenced not only by the racist comments themselves having been made, but by the fact that a colleague who overheard the comments did nothing, and two managers who were aware of the behaviour also failed to take any action in response.

Further, there was nothing to suggest that refresher training would not have been effective. Indeed, the EAT concluded that the employer must have considered that it was likely to be effective as it had provided the harasser with further training after the event.

So what does this mean for you as an employer?

This case serves as a useful reminder that you must not only provide training to your employees, but that you must also refresh and keep that training up to date.

In these disrupted times, where training may have fallen down the priority list, this is perhaps a timely warning to take another look at your training history, and to timetable any “top-ups” required.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Discrimination, diversity, harassment, training
UK People Reward and Mobility Team

About UK People Reward and Mobility Team

Our People, Reward and Mobility team in the UK advises on all aspects of employment law, both contentious and non-contentious, and covers the full range of pensions and employee benefits issues as well as all areas of immigration law.

All posts

You might also like...

  • Disability
  • Discrimination
  • Equality Act
  • Sickness absence

The challenges of managing short-term absences

By UK People Reward and Mobility Team
  • Employment contracts
  • General

The four-day working week: smarter, not harder?

By Victoria Albon
  • Contractors
  • Employment policies
  • Employment Status

Growth Plan 2022 proposals – off-payroll working rules to be repealed

By Elizabeth Bremner

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site