Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events and training
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

The government outlines its proposed amendments to the Equality Act 2010

By Verity Buckingham
November 24, 2023
  • Discrimination
  • Equal pay
  • Equality Act
  • Proposed legislative changes
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

On 7 November 2023, the government laid regulations before Parliament to preserve important EU-derived equality protections in UK law. The draft Equality Act 2010 (Amendment) Regulations 2023 (the Amendment Regulations) are required as a result of the cessation of retained EU law at the end of 2023.

The EU-derived laws that are to be re-enacted apply, amongst other rights, to pregnancy and maternity discrimination, discrimination by association and equal pay. The Amendment Regulations will enable workers and employees to continue to rely on protections currently in place.

Direct discrimination related to pregnancy, maternity and breastfeeding

  • UK law defines less favourable treatment on grounds of pregnancy and childbirth as direct sex discrimination. EU law extends this to include less favourable treatment on grounds of maternity. The Amendment Regulations add the word “maternity” into the Equality Act to preserve the scope of the protection against maternity discrimination.
  • Treating a woman less favourably at work because she is breastfeeding will be included as unlawful discrimination. Under the Equality Act, as currently in force, “work” is expressly excluded from this type of discrimination. Women have had to rely on EU case law to claim direct sex discrimination if treated less favourably at work due to breastfeeding.
  • The Equality Act currently prohibits pregnancy and pregnancy-related illness discrimination during the “protected period”. This covers the duration of the pregnancy and any statutory maternity leave period. By re-enacting EU case law, the Amendment Regulations will extend the protected period to include time after maternity leave to cover unfavourable treatment occurring after maternity leave has ended.

Indirect associative discrimination

Currently under the Equality Act, to bring a claim for indirect discrimination, the claimant themselves must have the relevant protected characteristic. However, EU case law has held that claimants can, in certain circumstances, establish indirect discrimination even if they do not share the protected characteristic of the disadvantaged group. The EU approach was applied in a recent employment tribunal case where a claimant successfully claimed indirect associative discrimination on the grounds of disability when she was required to return to the office full-time. She had caring responsibilities for her disabled mother and successfully argued the office policy indirectly discriminated against her, even though she herself was not disabled. The Amendment Regulations will insert a specific clause into the Equality Act specifying that claimants without the protected characteristic themselves can bring claims of indirect associative discrimination if they are associated with someone who does.

Direct discrimination relating to access to work

The Equality Act does not specifically prohibit discrimination relating to hiring which occurs outside an active recruitment process. Essentially, if an employer makes a comment about not wanting to employ people with certain protected characteristics, but the comment is outside an active recruitment process, it will not be unlawful. This is not the case in EU law – even if there is no identifiable victim, if an employer makes such comments, they can be liable for direct discrimination. The Amendment Regulations insert a new section into the Equality Act which will prohibit discriminatory statements made to the public or a section of the public in connection with decisions about to whom to offer employment.

Equal pay where employees’ terms are attributable to a single source

The Equality Act requires a woman bringing an equal pay claim to compare her contractual terms with a comparable man who is employed by the same or an associated employer, either at the same establishment or a different establishment where common terms apply. The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has no requirement for comparators to have the same or an associated employer. The only test is the “single source test” (i.e. a single body must be responsible for the alleged inequality of terms and have the ability to restore equal treatment). The Amendment Regulations will codify the single source test into a new subsection of the Equality Act and add a further subsection whereby workers governed by the same collective agreement can also be considered comparators.

Definition of disability

The Equality Act currently defines disability as a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on an individual’s ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. The Amendment Regulations, following EU case law, will insert a new paragraph stipulating that references to a person’s ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities include a person’s ability to participate fully and effectively in working life on an equal basis with other workers.

The Amendment Regulations mark a significant development by enacting protections based on EU law directly into UK law and so preserving those protections which have been relied upon for many years in some cases. The Amendment Regulations are subject to approval by both Houses of Parliament but are expected to take effect on 1 January 2024.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Discrimination, Equal Pay, Equality Act, proposed legislation changes
Verity Buckingham

About Verity Buckingham

Verity is experienced in all aspects of employment law and corporate immigration matters. She deals mostly with corporate clients advising on contentious and non-contentious employment matters. Verity's contentious practice includes defending claims in the Employment Tribunal and experience of Employment Appeal Tribunal litigation in relation to claims of unfair dismissal, discrimination, equal pay and whistleblowing.

All posts Full bio

You might also like...

  • Disability
  • Discrimination
  • Employee welfare
  • Legislation
  • Proposed legislative changes

Transforming support: the Health and Disability White Paper

By Helena Rozman
  • Discrimination
  • Equality Act
  • Financial Conduct Authority
  • Financial Services
  • Prudential Regulation Authority
  • Wellbeing
  • Whistleblowing

Proactive steps for employers embracing diversity and inclusion to shape the future of the UK financial sector – inclusion survey questions

By Alison Weatherhead, Sarah Jackman, and Katharine Harle
  • Disability
  • Discrimination
  • Employee benefits
  • Employee welfare
  • Employment policies
  • Employment status
  • Equal pay
  • Equality Act
  • Family friendly rights
  • Legislation
  • Low Paid Workers
  • National Minimum Wage
  • Pay, benefits and bonuses
  • Proposed legislative changes
  • Self-employed
  • Trade unions
  • Wellbeing
  • Working conditions

Unveiling Labour’s vision for workers’ rights

By Mark Hamilton

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site