The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) recently provided significant clarification on the principles related to resignation and dismissal – in particular, “in the heat of the moment” resignations. We look into this on our website.
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
About Alison Weatherhead
Alison supports and advises clients on the full range of human resource queries and acts for clients in employment tribunals and judicial mediations, predominantly for employers. Her experience in tribunals includes advising on unfair dismissal, disability discrimination claims, whistleblowing claims and unlawful deductions from wages.
Beth Johnston
You might also like...
Supreme Court rules that embassy staff are not excluded by state immunity
In the recent case of Benkharbouche v. Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs & Anor the Supreme Court agreed with the EAT and the Court of Appeal and unanimously held that sections 4(2)(b) and 16(1)(a) of the State Immunity Act 1978 (SIA) cannot protect embassies from Employment Tribunal claims brought by domestic staff in the UK.
Chumbu v. The Disabilities Trust: the EAT weighs in on compliance and costs in tribunal cases
- ACAS
- Atypical workers
- Carer's leave
- Collective consultation
- Contractors
- Discrimination
- Employment contracts
- Employment policies
- Employment status
- Equal pay
- Equality Act
- Ethnic pay gap reporting
- Family friendly rights
- Flexible working
- Gender pay gap reporting
- Grievance and disciplinary
- Industrial action
- Legislation
- Legislative changes
- Maternity leave
- Menopause
- Redundancy and business reorganisation
- Sick pay
- Termination
- TUPE/outsourcing
- Unfair dismissal
- Whistleblowing
- Zero-hours contracts
Employment Rights Bill at-a-glance
By
Laura Morrison and Lisa Watson
