Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events and training
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

Clarifying pay equality: no need to specify salary decision-maker for material factor defence

By Claire Maclean and Elouisa Crichton
November 11, 2024
  • Discrimination
  • Employment contracts
  • Equal pay
  • Equality Act
  • Gender pay gap reporting
  • Sex discrimination
  • Tribunal claims
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

We look at the material factor defence in equal pay claims on our website.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Discrimination, employment contracts, Equal Pay, Equality Act, gender pay gap reporting, sex discrimination, Tribunal claims
Claire Maclean

About Claire Maclean

Claire is experienced in advising employer clients in the public and private sectors on a wide range of contentious and non-contentious matters. Her expertise ranges from providing practical and commercial advice on all day-to-day HR queries to providing strategic advice on complex business reorganizations, redundancies and TUPE transfers. Claire has considerable experience in advising clients on all aspects of TUPE transfers, whether business transfers or changes in service provider.

All posts Full bio

Elouisa Crichton

Elouisa Crichton

All posts Full bio

You might also like...

  • Discrimination

Discrimination update – what constitutes a ‘philosophical belief’ under the Equality Act?

By admin
  • Discrimination
  • Family friendly rights

No requirement to enhance pay for shared parental leave

We blogged in June last year about the employment tribunal claim of Ali -v- Capita Customer Management Ltd where Mr Ali was successful in his claim for direct sex discrimination. Female employees at Capita were entitled to 14 weeks’ full pay on maternity leave whereas fathers were only entitled to two weeks’ full pay on paternity and shared parental leave. Mr Ali's wife was advised to return to work early from maternity leave after being diagnosed with post natal depression. Mr Ali asked Capita whether he could take leave instead and was told he could take shared parental leave on statutory pay. The Tribunal found that this was direct sex discrimination.

By Claire Maclean
  • Atypical workers
  • Employee benefits
  • Employment contracts
  • Employment policies
  • Employment status
  • Holiday pay
  • Legislative changes
  • Pay, benefits and bonuses

Employers’ essential read: new government guidance on holiday pay and entitlement

By Alison Weatherhead and Lorelle Doyle

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site