Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

The latest updates in employment, benefits, pensions and immigration

open menu close menu

UK People Reward and Mobility Hub

  • Home
  • Events and training
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the team
  • How we can help

Summer 2024 employment trends series: restrictive covenants

By William Azuh, Verity Buckingham, Laura Jackson, and Helena Rozman
August 14, 2024
  • Confidential information
  • Employment contracts
  • Restrictive covenants
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

As part of our summer 2024 employment trends series, we share our observations on developments in relation to restrictive covenants, both in the UK and further afield.

In the UK, we have not seen any new statutory developments on restrictive covenants following the previous government’s response to its consultation on post-termination non-compete clauses. In its response, which it published in May 2023, the government confirmed its intention to limit non-compete clauses in employment contracts to a maximum of three months. There were no proposed similar reforms for non-solicitation clauses.

Labour’s Plan to Make Work Pay did not touch on the issue of competition in the labour market but the government may take a similar approach if it deems it better for employees and that it would open the labour market up to more competition. We are likely to see employers trying to find a work-around in response to any tightening of non-compete restrictions, such as increasing notice periods or introducing covenants in non-employment contracts.

Despite the absence of statutory developments, we have seen a notable shift in strategy when it comes to employers protecting their legitimate business interests. Employers are increasingly sending letters before action requiring former employees (and, sometimes, their new employers) to sign up to undertakings not to breach restrictive covenants before there is any evidence of a breach. Whilst such letters are nothing new, this shows a shift towards a more preventative stance. We find employers want to use these letters pre-emptively to deter former employees from breaching their restrictions and to remind them of their continuing obligations, rather than reactively once the damage has been done.

Meanwhile, our colleagues in the US have had a rather more exciting development in the restrictive covenant arena. In April this year, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) approved the Final Rule, largely banning new non-compete agreements in employment and nullifying most existing ones, from the end of August 2024. Whilst there is ongoing litigation over the FTC’s authority to issue such a rule, given the short timeline before the Final Rule comes into effect, employers will still need to start preparing for this huge change in the law in the US.

In Europe, the European Commission has published guidance on how national competition authorities in EU member states should approach labour market agreements under competition law. Labour market agreements include agreements between employers not to poach the other’s employees. The Commission has said that such agreements are harmful for employees as they reduce wages and other benefits. There also could be knock-on effects for consumers. The messaging from the Commission and other competition authorities is that labour market agreements should be viewed as cartels, which attract the largest fines. Whilst the UK is no longer a member of the EU, the UK Competition and Markets Authority issued its own research report on Competition and market power in UK labour markets at the start of 2024. Read more in our Competition team’s article here.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Confidential Information, employment contracts, restrictive covenants
William Azuh

About William Azuh

William is an associate in the People, Reward and Mobility team at Dentons.

All posts

Verity Buckingham

About Verity Buckingham

Verity is experienced in all aspects of employment law and corporate immigration matters. She deals mostly with corporate clients advising on contentious and non-contentious employment matters. Verity's contentious practice includes defending claims in the Employment Tribunal and experience of Employment Appeal Tribunal litigation in relation to claims of unfair dismissal, discrimination, equal pay and whistleblowing.

All posts Full bio

Laura Jackson

Laura Jackson

All posts

Helena Rozman

About Helena Rozman

Helena has experience in acting for both employees and employers covering both contentious and non-contentious work. Helena's experience includes defending Employment Tribunal claims and engaging in settlement negotiations; advising clients on complex disciplinary matters, exit strategies and large restructuring exercises, including TUPE and redundancy; co-ordinating and responding to data subject access requests; advising on the employment implications on business and asset purchases and outsourcing arrangements; project managing and advising clients on multi-jurisdictional projects with our international offices; drafting settlement agreements for exiting employees; advising on the employment aspects of corporate transactions and undertaking due diligence; and reviewing contracts, company handbooks and policies.

All posts Full bio

You might also like...

  • Employment contracts
  • Legislation
  • Legislative changes
  • Low Paid Workers

Ban on exclusivity clauses to be extended

By Christopher Seymour
  • Employee benefits
  • Employment contracts
  • Employment policies
  • Sick pay
  • Sickness absence

A cautionary tale: employer’s liability not limited by the terms of an insurance policy

By Helena Rozman
  • Discrimination
  • Employee benefits
  • Employment contracts
  • Pay, benefits and bonuses
  • Sickness absence
  • Unfair dismissal

Is it safe to dismiss an employee who is receiving long-term disability benefits?

The EAT has dealt a blow to employers, confirming that the purpose of permanent health insurance and similar schemes would […]

By Laura Morrison

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site