1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar

Government consultation: “Health is everyone’s business”

The government has launched a consultation on ways in which government and employers can take action to reduce ill-health-related job loss in the UK.

Despite low unemployment figures, it remains the case that those who suffer from ill health face barriers entering and remaining in work. The government reported that although around 8 in 10 non-disabled people are employed, only five in 10 disabled people are in work, and disabled people are 10 times more likely to leave work following long-term sickness absence than non-disabled people.

The government is seeking views on a number of proposals which aim to encourage early action by employers to engage with and support employees with long-term health conditions, including:

  • A right for employees to request work(place) modifications on health grounds. Under the Equality Act 2010, employers are currently under a duty to make reasonable adjustments where an employee with a disability and is placed at a substantial disadvantage as a result of a provision, criterion or practice imposed by the employer, a physical feature of the employer’s premises or a failure by the employer to provide an auxiliary aid. The proposed change would allow employees to request that modifications are made even where the employee doesn’t meet the definition of disabled under the 2010 Act. The employer, unlike under the duty to make reasonable adjustments, would be able to refuse a request for workplace modifications on legitimate business grounds.
  • Reform of Statutory Sick Pay (SSP). The proposed changes would enable an employee returning from a period of sickness absence to have a flexible, phased return to work while still receiving some SSP and would see those who do not qualify for SSP (as they earn below the Lower Earnings Limit) receive a proportion of their wage as SSP. Additionally, there are proposals to increase the fines for failure to pay SSP where it is due, and the inclusion of the enforcement of SSP within the remit of a proposed new, single labour market enforcement body (see further commentary on the consultation in relation to this new body here.
  • Ways of improving the use of Occupational Health (OH) services by employers. The government is seeking views on ways to reduce the costs, increase market capacity and improve the value and quality of OH services.

The proposed measures aim to recognise the role that employers play in assisting employees with disabilities and health conditions to stay at work, and the importance of the employer taking early action. The consultation looks to measure the impact of the proposals on businesses, individuals and the occupational health profession. The views gathered during the consultation will inform government policy in this area. The consultation will run until 7 October 2019 and is available here.

Government consultation: “Health is everyone’s business”

Foretelling the future: when can you take into account future ability in recruitment decisions?

A recent case demonstrates the risk in considering an individual's future performance when making management decisions about them. It is a reminder that, when making assumptions about an employee's ability to perform a role, it is very important not to cross the line into making discriminatory decisions.
Read more »
Foretelling the future: when can you take into account future ability in recruitment decisions?

Can an employee’s dismissal be discriminatory if the employer only finds out about the disability at the appeal hearing?

In Baldeh v. Churches Housing Association of Dudley and District Ltd [2019] UKEAT/0290/18, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that, where an employer is unaware of an employee's disability at the time of dismissal but learns about this disability at an appeal hearing, the dismissal may be considered discriminatory.
Read more »
Can an employee’s dismissal be discriminatory if the employer only finds out about the disability at the appeal hearing?

When does an employee’s entitlement to long-term disability benefits cease?

In ICTS (UK) Limited v. Visram UKEAT/0133/18, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether an employee's entitlement to long-term disability benefits (LTDB) until his "return to work" meant a return to his old job or to any reasonable alternative. It held that it meant the former.

, ,

Read more »
When does an employee’s entitlement to long-term disability benefits cease?

EAT judgment provides guidance on making reasonable adjustments for disabled employees

In the recent case of Linsley v. Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Custom UKEAT/0150/18 the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) gave guidance on factors to be taken into account in deciding whether an adjustment is reasonable.

,

Read more »
EAT judgment provides guidance on making reasonable adjustments for disabled employees

Acas publishes guidance on workplace neurodiversity

Acas has published guidance to help employers learn about neurodiversity and to suggest changes that can be made in the workplace to better support neurodivergent staff.
Read more »
Acas publishes guidance on workplace neurodiversity

Disability discrimination: EAT clarifies definition of “long-term” disability

In Nissa v. Waverly Education Foundation, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) clarified the definition of "disability" under the Equality Act 2010.
Read more »
Disability discrimination: EAT clarifies definition of “long-term” disability

Constructive knowledge of disability: when should employers reasonably know of an employee’s disability?

In the recent case of Lamb v. The Garrard Academy the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered at what point employers have a duty to make reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010 (the Act).
Read more »
Constructive knowledge of disability: when should employers reasonably know of an employee’s disability?

Supreme Court considers “unfavourable” treatment in relation to disability discrimination

The Supreme Court has found that calculating an employee's pension entitlement based on the employee's part-time salary (where the employee had been prevented from working full-time due to his disability) was not "unfavourable treatment" under the Equality Act. If the employee been able to work full-time he would not have been entitled to immediate payment of his pension.
Read more »
Supreme Court considers “unfavourable” treatment in relation to disability discrimination

Disability discrimination: Dismissal of a shoplifting employee with a tendency to steal

The EAT, in Wood v. Durham County Council, confirmed that an employee's "tendency to steal" was a manifestation of his disability and as such was an excluded condition under the Equality Act (Disability) Regulations 2010. The claimant's disability discrimination claim was therefore dismissed.
Read more »
Disability discrimination: Dismissal of a shoplifting employee with a tendency to steal